Fact-Check ReportReleased July 30, 2026

Joe Rogan Experience #2533 - Diana Pasulka

Host: Joe Rogan&Guest: Diana Pasulka
Checked claim by claimSources cited
The Jamie Meter

How many times someone at the table should have said “pull that up.”

How it's scored
3 of 5
Look into it

16 claims didn't hold up. False, distorted, or one-sided. Unverified claims don't count against it.

Enough got stretched that you'll want the sources open.

Claim by claim(25 claims flagged)

Checked against live sources
What he said

Travis Walton has taken polygraph tests regularly and always passed them.

What's actually true

Walton's polygraph history is mixed, not a string of passes. An early unpublished test by examiner Jack McCarthy rated his story as gross deception, and he outright failed a 2008 polygraph on Fox's Moment of Truth when asked directly if he'd been abducted. He has also passed other tests, so results have gone both ways, not always in his favor.

Unverified
Hear it at 7:33
What he said

There is a pattern match between UFO experiences and experiences traditionally categorized as demonic.

It's entirely possible

While some researchers and theologians have noted thematic overlaps between historical accounts of demonic entities and modern UFO reports, there is no empirical scientific consensus establishing a formal pattern match. Determining the validity of this comparison would require a standardized longitudinal study comparing experiential descriptions across centuries and cultures.

Pull that up, Jamie(7:33)No source captured on this pass
What he said

Garry Nolan claimed on Tucker Carlson's show that anomalous beings are deceptive and lie to people.

It's entirely possible

Garry Nolan has discussed the nature of anomalous beings in various public appearances, but specific claims regarding these entities being deceptive or lying require direct review of the interview transcript. Without access to verify the exact wording of his statements on the program, this claim remains unconfirmed.

Pull that up, Jamie(11:51)No source captured on this pass
What he said

John Keel wrote the book The Mothman Prophecies, and the film of the same name is based on his life.

What's actually true

Keel really did write the 1975 book The Mothman Prophecies, and the 2002 film really is based on it. But the movie isn't based on Keel's life, it's a heavily fictionalized retelling of the events he documented in Point Pleasant, with a renamed lead character and an altered timeline. Calling it based on his life overstates what the adaptation actually is.

What he said

Cattle mutilations were a government testing program designed to measure the effects of radiation from the 1967 Project Gasbuggy detonation.

It's entirely possible

This is Jamie reading a Wikipedia summary of somebody else's theory out loud. As soon as he finishes, the guest says the theory is "completely not accurate" and Jamie notes it was only a brief entry. Nobody on the show put it forward as true.

Pull that up, Jamie(41:42)No source captured on this pass
What he said

Richard Dodi intentionally planted disinformation on Paul Bennewitz's computer to mislead him about alien contact.

What's actually true

This almost certainly refers to Richard Doty, likely misheard as Dodi, the AFOSI agent who really did feed Paul Bennewitz false information to convince him he'd intercepted alien communications. But the documented methods were forged papers, staged briefings, and physical setups like fake air vents, not anything planted on his computer specifically.

What he said

The Pentagon never passes budgets.

What's actually true

This mixes up two different things. The Pentagon does get its budget passed. Congress has appropriated its funding pretty much every year through the normal process. What the Pentagon has never done is pass its own financial audit, failing every one since audits became mandatory in 2018. Real ongoing problem, just the wrong word for it.

What he said

Garry Nolan discovered alloys at UFO crash sites that possess a layered structure at the atomic level.

What's actually true

Nolan has talked publicly, including on TV, about analyzing exotic materials tied to UAP claims. But researchers who've gone through his actual peer-reviewed papers point out those papers say nothing otherworldly was found, which is far more cautious than the claims made in interviews. That gap between the published science and the media version is the real issue here.

What he said

Harold Malmgren was a physicist at Cornell who was recruited into secret government programs at age 27.

What's actually true

Malmgren was an economist, not a physicist. He held a doctorate in economics from Oxford and worked as an assistant professor of economics at Cornell, then joined the Institute for Defense Analyses in 1962 around age 27 as an economic analyst. His later claims about secret government and UFO-related programs, including a supposed Cuban Missile Crisis role, were investigated using declassified FBI files and job records and found to be fabricated.

What he said

The U.S. military abducted the president of Venezuela and incapacitated everyone using a sound weapon.

What's actually true

There's a real event buried in here. In January 2026 the U.S. military did capture Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro in a Delta Force operation and flew him out of the country to face drug trafficking charges in New York. But there's no record of a sound weapon being used to incapacitate anyone during that operation, so that specific detail isn't supported.

What he said

The Bush administration convened a group of scientists to discuss the disclosure of alien crafts and biological remains.

It's entirely possible

While there have been various government studies on unidentified aerial phenomena, no documented evidence confirms that the Bush administration convened a formal scientific panel specifically to discuss alien crafts or biological remains. Substantiating this would require official government documentation or declassified meeting minutes.

Pull that up, Jamie(1:43:05)No source captured on this pass
What he said

More than 80% of people in the United States believe in God.

What's actually true

This is close but the picture has gotten murkier than a clean majority. Gallup's long-running trend question put belief in God at 81% in 2022, its lowest point ever but still just over 80%. A newer Gallup survey in 2023 that explicitly offered an 'unsure' option found only 74% said they believe in God, below 80%. So depending on how the question is asked, recent numbers land on both sides of that line.

What he said

More than 50% of Christians believe in the worldview of Enoch involving watchers and fallen angels.

It's entirely possible

While Enochian themes appear in some Christian traditions, there is no comprehensive demographic study confirming that a majority of global Christians subscribe to a specific Enochian worldview. Verifying this would require large-scale quantitative polling on theological beliefs across all denominations.

Pull that up, Jamie(1:49:49)No source captured on this pass
What he said

Paul the Apostle's instruction for women to wear veils in church was specifically because angels might be attracted to them.

What's actually true

Paul does cite angels as a reason for head coverings in 1 Corinthians 11:10, so there's a real basis here. But most New Testament scholars read this as angels being present as witnesses to proper order and conduct during worship, not as beings who might be sexually attracted to unveiled women. The attraction reading exists as a minority view tied to Genesis 6 traditions, but presenting it as the specific, settled reason overstates it.

What he said

The Catholic Church rejects biblical literalism due to contradictory accounts within the text.

What's actually true

The Church really does reject strict literalism, that part is accurate. But its own stated reasoning isn't primarily about contradictions in the text. Catholic teaching holds that Genesis uses a non-literal genre meant to convey theological truth about God and creation, discovered through sound exegesis and interpreted alongside tradition, rather than being rejected because its accounts conflict with each other.

What he said

The Book of Enoch conveys a spirit of truth.

It's entirely possible

This is the guest stating a religious belief when asked what she believes. Her words begin "do I believe." A statement of faith is not the kind of claim this site checks.

Pull that up, Jamie(2:00:18)No source captured on this pass
What he said

The speaker documented a specific UFO sighting near Folsom Lake that was reported in a local newspaper.

It's entirely possible

Without the ability to perform a live search of historical local newspaper archives near Folsom Lake, it is impossible to confirm the existence of this specific report. This claim requires access to local digital archives or specific dates to verify if the event and the corresponding media coverage occurred.

Pull that up, Jamie(2:03:38)No source captured on this pass
What he said

Techniques used in 'psionics' or CE-5 protocols require giving permission for extraterrestrial entities to interact with a person.

It's entirely possible

CE-5 (Close Encounters of the Fifth Kind) protocols involve meditation and consciousness-based techniques intended to initiate contact, but the requirement of 'giving permission' is a subjective interpretive claim within the UFO community. There is no empirical scientific evidence to support that such interaction occurs, making the procedural requirements a matter of belief rather than verifiable fact.

Pull that up, Jamie(2:11:33)No source captured on this pass
What he said

Psychedelics are a quick but dangerous method to open the spiritual sense in the human brain.

It's entirely possible

The concept of a 'spiritual sense' in the brain is not a recognized neurobiological or psychological construct. Whether psychedelics effectively 'open' such a sense is a subjective, metaphysical claim that cannot be empirically verified through scientific consensus.

Pull that up, Jamie(2:12:30)No source captured on this pass
What he said

Human beings have a 'spiritual sense' related to the pineal gland that allows for connection to the sacred.

What's actually true

There's no scientific support for this. The pineal gland's only confirmed function is producing melatonin to regulate sleep and circadian rhythms. The idea of it as a 'spiritual sense' or seat of the soul traces back to Descartes' 17th century philosophy and was later picked up by 19th century theosophists as the 'third eye,' not to any established neuroscience.

What he said

The Shroud of Turin contains pollen matches for plants that existed in Jerusalem 2,000 years ago.

What's actually true

Pollen studies on the Shroud exist, but they show a disputed picture rather than a clean match. A 2015 DNA study found plant traces from many different regions, consistent with a lot of possible origins, and researchers who re-examined specific pollen samples identified different species than originally claimed. Calling it a confirmed pollen match to Jerusalem plants overstates a genuinely contested body of research.

What he said

The Shroud of Turin was studied at Duke University in the 1980s.

What's actually true

The documented record of major 20th century Shroud research doesn't include Duke. The 1978 STURP team drew scientists from places like Los Alamos National Laboratory, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Sandia Labs, IBM, and the Air Force Academy, and the 1988 radiocarbon dating came from Oxford, Arizona, and the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. No Duke connection shows up in that history.

What he said

The image on the Virgin of Guadalupe tilma was miraculously imparted onto the cloak in the 1500s.

What's actually true

Whether the image is miraculous is a matter of faith, but the forensic record is more mixed than a clean miracle claim suggests. Multiple material analyses of the tilma have found pigments common in 16th century Mexico and clear signs of retouching and repainting over the centuries. Some researchers argue certain original elements remain unexplained, but that's a contested claim, not a confirmed scientific finding.

What he said

The Shroud of Turin features a reverse negative image that cannot be explained as a forgery from the 14th century.

What's actually true

The negative-image effect on the Shroud is real and was noted after it was first photographed in 1898. But it isn't true that this effect cannot be explained by a 14th century forgery. Researchers have proposed several plausible medieval techniques, including painting, acid etching, and bas relief methods, that could produce a similar effect.

What he said

Stony Brook University and Renaissance Technologies are associated in a way that functions as a front for secret research.

What's actually true

The real connection is legitimate: James Simons chaired Stony Brook's math department for about a decade before founding Renaissance Technologies nearby, and the firm has strong ties to the university through donations and recruiting. But there's no documentation that this relationship functions as a front for secret government research. Simons did work as a codebreaker for a defense-linked institute, but that ended years before Renaissance existed and had nothing to do with Stony Brook.

All of this ran on its own. The claims got pulled out of the transcript, then checked against live sources.

This can get things wrong. Follow the sources and decide for yourself.

New episode, new check

Get the check before you finish the episode.

JRE drops four or five episodes a week. We check every one and send a short note with the Jamie Meter and the claims that didn't hold up.

One email when a new episode is checked. Unsubscribe anytime.